“Freeloaders,” “time management issues,” and “poor communication” are frequent complaints from students regarding group work at university. These challenges often undermine the effectiveness and perceived value of collaborative projects. The question remains: How can we make group work more effective and equitable? Self-evaluation encourages students to reflect on their learning, fostering individual growth, engagement, and motivation. Peer evaluation, on the other hand, enhances critical thinking, self-reflection, and the development of communication and collaboration skills. The key challenge lies in making peer evaluation both meaningful and actionable. In this presentation, we’ll explore a scalable and universally applicable approach that combines self and peer evaluation to address common group work issues, thereby improving the overall group work experience. By integrating these evaluation methods, we can promote individual accountability and enhance the collective success of student groups.
Teaching@Sydney