{"id":25385,"date":"2026-02-16T15:40:16","date_gmt":"2026-02-16T04:40:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/educational-innovation.sydney.edu.au\/teaching@sydney\/?p=25385"},"modified":"2026-02-18T14:11:14","modified_gmt":"2026-02-18T03:11:14","slug":"active-learning-anywhere","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/educational-innovation.sydney.edu.au\/teaching@sydney\/active-learning-anywhere\/","title":{"rendered":"Active Learning Anywhere"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1>Practical techniques for effective engagement in flat\u2011floor, tiered, online, and hybrid classes<\/h1>\n<p>The start of the academic year is always an exciting time for students and their educators, with everybody eager to learn together and build lasting relationships. It\u2019s an ideal time to introduce active learning activities into classes to encourage this social, <a href=\"https:\/\/educational-innovation.sydney.edu.au\/teaching@sydney\/making-relationship-rich-experiences-the-heart-of-higher-education\/\">relationship-rich learning<\/a>, known to promote <a href=\"https:\/\/educational-innovation.sydney.edu.au\/teaching@sydney\/working-it-out-for-themselves-the-effect-of-active-learning-on-student-outcomes\/\">deeper learning and belonging, and reduce achievement gaps<\/a> (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.press.jhu.edu\/books\/title\/12146\/relationship-rich-education?srsltid=AfmBOoqJt9vkGmCDemgPQ_SJvJmrqZ2CKXAzkaItXuNLg6xsN6f15wcg\">Felten &amp; Lambert, 2020<\/a>, \u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.pnas.org\/doi\/abs\/10.1073\/pnas.1319030111\">Freeman et al., 2014<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.pnas.org\/doi\/10.1073\/pnas.1916903117https:\/\/www.pnas.org\/doi\/10.1073\/pnas.1916903117\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Theobald et al. 2020<\/a>).<\/p>\n<p>Active learning approaches have been defined as \u201cinstructional activities involving students in doing things and thinking about what they are doing\u201d (<a href=\"https:\/\/eric.ed.gov\/?id=ED336049\">Bonwell and Eison, 1991, p. 2)<\/a>. The approaches described below have been consistently shown to work effectively in many disciplines across STEMM, social sciences, arts, and the humanities.<\/p>\n<p>This semester, you may find yourself with a very full class and you may be teaching in a venue that is less than ideal for active learning \u2013 for example, a tutorial in a tiered venue. You may also be teaching in online or in a hybrid\/hyflex mode with students in front of you and online simultaneously. We\u2019ve included strategies for these scenarios. My (Adam\u2019s) favourite venue for active learning is actually the Chemistry lecture theatres, which are quite steeply tiered. My experience was that groups worked well with students on adjacent rows and the physical effort of keeping in contact with the groups kept me on my toes and intellectually active.<\/p>\n<p>If you already use active learning techniques in your classes, we hope there may be some new ideas in our list. If this will be your first time, perhaps try one or two in the first few weeks. Our experience is that students engage well and really don\u2019t mind if things don\u2019t go perfectly. We have ordered these from less in-class time to more, but the timings given are very approximate.<br \/>\n<div class=\"sc-accordion\">\n<a class=\"trigger\" href=\"#\">Active Learning Approaches That Take Less In-Class Time<\/a>\r\n\t   \t\t   <div class=\"content\">\n<h3>Minute Papers<\/h3>\n<p><strong>What it is:<\/strong> Brief written reflections on key ideas or uncertainties; excellent to allow students to formulate their ideas before verbal participation. These can also be turned in at the beginning of class as an \u201centry ticket\u201d or done at the end as an &#8220;exit ticket.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong>Flat\u2011floor:<\/strong> Collect on paper or <a href=\"https:\/\/educational-innovation.sydney.edu.au\/teaching@sydney\/padlet-and-collaborative-learning\/\">Padlet<\/a>; skim quickly and address 1\u20132 themes immediately; park the rest for the next class opener.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Tiered:<\/strong> Use a digital form to avoid aisle congestion; project anonymised responses to validate concerns and clarify quickly.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Online:<\/strong> Collect via chat, <a href=\"https:\/\/support.zoom.com\/hc\/en\/article?id=zm_kb&amp;sysparm_article=KB0066150\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Zoom polls<\/a>, or a form; display three representative, anonymised responses; close with a concise \u201chere\u2019s what we\u2019ll fix next\u201d statement.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Hybrid:<\/strong> Use <a href=\"https:\/\/educational-innovation.sydney.edu.au\/teaching@sydney\/padlet-and-collaborative-learning\/\">Padlet<\/a> for everyone or a single digital form. If you are keen to understand different experiences of the two cohorts, be sure give students a chance to identify their group &#8211; read out a mix of in\u2011room and online examples to make both cohorts visible.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Examples:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>STEMM:<\/strong> \u201cState one assumption in today\u2019s model and one limitation it introduces.\u201d<\/li>\n<li><strong>Humanities and social sciences:<\/strong> \u201cWhich interpretive lens helped most today, and where did it fall short?\u201d<\/li>\n<li><strong>All:<\/strong> \u201cWhat is one key thing you learned from today\u2019s class and one muddiest point?\u201d<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Timing\/Pacing:<\/strong> 2 min writing \u2192 2\u20133 min rapid theming\/debrief. If time is tight, defer debrief to the first 5 minutes of the next session.<\/p>\n<h3>Muddiest Point<\/h3>\n<p><strong>What it is:<\/strong> Students identify the concept they found most confusing.<strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Flat\u2011floor:<\/strong> Paper\/post\u2011its at the door; theme into top three quickly; address one immediately.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Tiered:<\/strong> Use a <a href=\"https:\/\/educational-innovation.sydney.edu.au\/teaching@sydney\/maximising-student-engagement-connection-and-learning-with-mentimeter\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Mentimeter<\/a> or a quick form; auto\u2011generate a word cloud or list; open the next class with the top issues.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Online:<\/strong> Collect via Menti\/chat\/form; summarise live; add one clarifying example on the spot.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Hybrid:<\/strong> Single form for both cohorts; make sure to ask students if they are on Zoom or in the Room; show a mix of in\u2011room and remote responses; plan a \u201ctop 3\u201d slide for the next session.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Examples:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>STEMM:<\/strong> \u201cWhich step in the diffusion equation derivation lost you, and why?\u201d<\/li>\n<li><strong>Humanities and social sciences:<\/strong> \u201cWhich theoretical term remains unclear? Provide a sentence where you tried to use it.\u201d<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Timing\/Pacing:<\/strong> 1\u20132 min write \u2192 2\u20133 min address. If time is tight, defer to next class\u2019s 5\u2011minute opener.<\/p>\n<h3>Think\u2013Pair\u2013Share<\/h3>\n<p><strong>What it is:<\/strong> Students think individually, discuss with a partner, then share with the class.<strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Flat\u2011floor:<\/strong> Invite students to turn chairs or lightly reposition to face partners. Keep a predictable rhythm (e.g., 30s think, 2 min talk) and circulate to prompt quieter pairs (or any student who was left without a pair).<\/p>\n<p><strong>Tiered:<\/strong> Ask students to pair within the same row or directly above\/below. Keep the pair stage short; collect ideas via a roving microphone or quick poll (see below).<\/p>\n<p><strong>Online:<\/strong> Use auto\u2011assigned breakout rooms for &#8220;pairs&#8221; (though we recommend at least 3 per group); broadcast the prompt and visible countdown. Bring pairs back and harvest 2\u20133 insights via Zoom chat or encourage students to briefly unmute and share.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Hybrid:<\/strong> Pair in\u2011room students locally; &#8220;pair&#8221; remote students in breakout rooms. Get students from both modalities to contribute (via a poll or Zoom chat) before you give a concise synthesis.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Examples:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>STEMM:<\/strong> \u201cSketch a free\u2011body diagram for a sliding block with friction. What\u2019s the biggest misconception?\u201d<\/li>\n<li><strong>Humanities and social sciences:<\/strong> \u201cWhich passage best captures the author\u2019s critique of industrial modernity\u2014and why?\u201d<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Timing\/Pacing:<\/strong> 0:30 think \u2192 2:00 pair \u2192 2\u20133 min share. Use a visible timer; if energy dips, cold\u2011call <em>pairs<\/em> (not individuals) for a quick insight. Variations include \u201cWrite-Pair-Share\u201d and \u201cPair-Share&#8221;, which streamlines this by eliminating the \u201cthink\u201d portion.<\/p>\n<h3>Polling \/ Clicker Questions<\/h3>\n<p><strong>What it is:<\/strong> Students commit to answers using polling using a tool like <a href=\"https:\/\/educational-innovation.sydney.edu.au\/teaching@sydney\/maximising-student-engagement-connection-and-learning-with-mentimeter\/https:\/educational-innovation.sydney.edu.au\/teaching@sydney\/maximising-student-engagement-connection-and-learning-with-mentimeter\/\">Mentimeter<\/a>. Use questions that emphasise reasoning over recall to sustain attention, but also can be useful for icebreakers (e.g., What topics in the unit outline interest you most in studying the sociology of medicine?) and to heighten motivation by asking students to make predictions .<\/p>\n<p><strong>Flat\u2011floor:<\/strong> Pose a question then discuss.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Tiered:<\/strong> Place QR codes and short links prominently.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Online:<\/strong> Screen\u2011share the poll and debrief.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Hybrid:<\/strong> Run a single poll for everyone.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Examples:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>STEMM:<\/strong> \u201cFor weak acid HA (<em>K<\/em><sub>a<\/sub> given), which mixture yields the highest pH? Explain.\u201d<\/li>\n<li><strong>Humanities and social sciences:<\/strong> \u201cWhich thesis best explains the political subtext of the speech?\u201d<strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>Arts<\/strong>: &#8220;Which piece is the best example of the Baroque period?&#8221;<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Timing\/Pacing:<\/strong> 30s-1 min vote \u2192 2:00 debrief. If results are split, invite two students to discuss or defend alternatives for 30s each.<\/p>\n<h3>Peer Instruction<\/h3>\n<p><strong>What it is:<\/strong> Individual vote \u2192 peer discussion \u2192 revote \u2192 instructor explanation. Good for problem-solving questions or issues where there might be a split in student viewpoint.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Flat\u2011floor:<\/strong> Encourage quick neighbour discussions; show before\/after histograms; focus on the misconception.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Tiered:<\/strong> Pair within rows; prompt students to find someone with a different answer; use histograms to direct explanation.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Online:<\/strong> Poll \u2192 breakout discuss \u2192 revote; analyse shift; invite one student to explain the \u201cwhy.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong>Hybrid:<\/strong> Single poll; in\u2011room discuss locally; remote discuss in breakout; revote and compare shifts by cohort.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Examples:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>STEMM:<\/strong> \u201cWhich graph reflects the transient response of an underdamped system?\u201d<\/li>\n<li><strong>Humanities and social sciences:<\/strong> \u201cWhich interpretation best aligns with the author\u2019s narrative irony?\u201d<\/li>\n<li><strong>Arts:<\/strong> &#8220;Which is most characteristic of the Gothic period?&#8221;<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Timing\/Pacing:<\/strong> 0:45s vote \u2192 2:00 discuss \u2192 0:30s revote \u2192 2\u20133 min explanation. If no shift, present a simpler parallel problem.<\/p>\n<h3>Predictions<\/h3>\n<p><strong>What it is:<\/strong> Students predict outcomes, such as before a demonstration or after seeing some data or historical records, then reconcile predictions with results. This technique is great for bringing out misconceptions.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Flat\u2011floor:<\/strong> Groups record predictions on mini\u2011whiteboards (or even loose paper); sample a few before the demo; after, ask one group to reconcile prediction vs outcome.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Tiered:<\/strong> Poll predictions via <a href=\"https:\/\/educational-innovation.sydney.edu.au\/teaching@sydney\/padlet-and-collaborative-learning\/\">Padlet<\/a> or <a href=\"https:\/\/educational-innovation.sydney.edu.au\/teaching@sydney\/maximising-student-engagement-connection-and-learning-with-mentimeter\/https:\/educational-innovation.sydney.edu.au\/teaching@sydney\/maximising-student-engagement-connection-and-learning-with-mentimeter\/\">Mentimeter<\/a>; invite 1-2 students to articulate the mechanism or their rationale.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Online:<\/strong> Stream the demo via doc cam or show data\/records via slides; collect predictions via a poll; discuss using chat\/mic.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Hybrid:<\/strong> Same as online.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Examples:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>STEMM:<\/strong> \u201cPredict current\/brightness changes when adding a resistor in parallel; reconcile with Kirchhoff\u2019s laws.\u201d<\/li>\n<li><strong>Humanities and social sciences:<\/strong> \u201cPredict how interpretation shifts when a crucial line is delivered with a different tone; discuss performance theory.\u201d<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Timing\/Pacing:<\/strong> 1 min predict \u2192 2 min discuss \u2192 2 min demo \u2192 3 min explanation. Or, 1-5 min presentation of data or past historical cases \u2192 1 min prediction \u2192 5-10 min discussion. Add a quick \u201cWhy not X?\u201d misconception check if attention drifts.<br \/>\n<\/div>\n<a class=\"trigger\" href=\"#\">Active Learning Approaches That Take a Bit More In-Class Time<\/a>\r\n\t   \t\t   <div class=\"content\">\n<h3>Small\u2011Group Problem Solving<\/h3>\n<p><strong>What it is:<\/strong> Groups tackle a short, structured problem with a clear deliverable.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Flat\u2011floor:<\/strong> Form trios\/quads; provide a concrete output (figure, table, brief paragraph). Offer a mid\u2011task checkpoint to keep momentum.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Tiered:<\/strong> Group by row; capture answers via shared doc, poll, or short verbal report; design problems solvable verbally or on phones due to limited surfaces.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Online:<\/strong> Create breakout groups; use a shared doc\/worksheet or <a href=\"https:\/\/educational-innovation.sydney.edu.au\/teaching@sydney\/padlet-and-collaborative-learning\/\">Padlet<\/a>; broadcast time cues and hints at minute 3; start a google timer on screen.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Hybrid:<\/strong> Run in\u2011room and online groups in parallel; combine outputs in a shared doc or <a href=\"https:\/\/educational-innovation.sydney.edu.au\/teaching@sydney\/padlet-and-collaborative-learning\/\">Padlet<\/a>; debrief with 1\u20132 exemplars from each modality.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Examples:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>STEMM:<\/strong> \u201cChoose the appropriate statistical test for this dataset and justify assumptions.\u201d<\/li>\n<li><strong>Humanities and social sciences:<\/strong> \u201cFrom these 8 historical events, draft a thesis about which has had the most significant impact on the history of the Internet. One group member should write your thesis on <a href=\"https:\/\/educational-innovation.sydney.edu.au\/teaching@sydney\/padlet-and-collaborative-learning\/\">Padlet<\/a>.\u201d<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Timing\/Pacing:<\/strong> 5\u20137 min work \u2192 5-10 min report\u2011out (two groups max) \u2192 1\u20132 min instructor synthesis. Add a hint if progress stalls.<\/p>\n<h3>Brainstorming<\/h3>\n<p><strong>What it is:<\/strong> Idea generation, sharing, clustering, and prioritisation.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Flat\u2011floor:<\/strong> Solo sticky notes \u2192 share\/cluster on a board \u2192 dot\u2011vote to prioritise; keep the prompt visible.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Tiered:<\/strong> Use a digital board for capture and ranking; project the evolving clusters clearly.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Online:<\/strong> Rapid \u201cchat storm\u201d \u2192 cluster ideas in a shared board \u2192 rank; call on 1\u20132 contributors to justify top picks.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Hybrid:<\/strong> Use a single digital board (<a href=\"https:\/\/educational-innovation.sydney.edu.au\/teaching@sydney\/padlet-and-collaborative-learning\/\">Padlet<\/a> is a great tool); rank together.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Examples:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>STEM:<\/strong> \u201cList potential sources of error in our measurement pipeline; rank by impact.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Humanities &amp; Arts:<\/strong> \u201cList interpretive angles for the poem; rank which yields the most original argument.\u201d<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Timing\/Pacing:<\/strong> 2 min solo \u2192 5 min share\/cluster \u2192 2 min vote \u2192 5-10 min discuss top picks.<\/p>\n<h3>Silent Discussion<\/h3>\n<p><strong>What it is:<\/strong> Text-based in-class discussion; excellent to encourage multiple modes of participation. Works best with fewer than 30 contributors per document.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Flat\u2011floor:<\/strong> Use a share doc to pose 1-3 questions, each separated by a page break. Students respond via dot points under each. After idea generation slows, ask students to upvote by putting a \u201c+1\u201d next to ideas, based on some criterion (ones with which they most resonate, ones that they feel are most feasible).<\/p>\n<p><strong>Tiered:<\/strong> Same as flat-floor.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Online:<\/strong> Same as flat-floor.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Hybrid:<\/strong> Same as flat-floor.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Examples:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>&#8220;What changes would you suggest in this class to help you learn better?&#8221;<\/li>\n<li>&#8220;Based on the implications of this week\u2019s readings, what should parliament do next?&#8221;<\/li>\n<li>[3 text excerpts] &#8220;What are real-life examples of this?&#8221;<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Timing\/Pacing:<\/strong> 5-15 minute initial writing, 5 minute up-voting, 5-10 minute debrief<\/p>\n<h3>Collaborative Annotation<\/h3>\n<p><strong>What it is:<\/strong> Students annotate readings\/slides together to highlight key points and questions.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Flat\u2011floor:<\/strong> Group markup on printed excerpts or posters; ask students to initial comments; harvest one insight and one question per group.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Tiered:<\/strong> Follow instructions for flat-floor and use small groups; can project selected highlights to prompt discussion.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Online:<\/strong> Shared annotation (e.g., in Word or <a href=\"https:\/\/educational-innovation.sydney.edu.au\/teaching@sydney\/padlet-and-collaborative-learning\/\">Padlet<\/a>); use comment threads and tags for themes, or you might share the excerpt on Zoom and use Zoom\u2019s annotation tool to ask your students to stamp the document.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Hybrid:<\/strong> Same as online.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Examples:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>STEMM:<\/strong> Annotate a research abstract to identify hypothesis, methods, limitations, and ethics.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Humanities:<\/strong> Annotate a stanza for imagery, allusions, meter, and political resonance.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Arts<\/strong>: Annotate the artist statement for key themes and artistic intentions.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Timing\/Pacing:<\/strong> 5-10 min annotate \u2192 5-10 min whole\u2011class harvest. Provide 2\u20133 guiding tags to focus attention.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<a class=\"trigger\" href=\"#\">Active Learning Approaches That Take Most In-Class Time<\/a>\r\n\t   \t\t   <div class=\"content\">\n<h3>Carousel Brainstorming<\/h3>\n<p><strong>What it is:<\/strong> Prompt generative thinking, followed by prioritisation.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Flat\u2011floor:<\/strong> Develop multiple topics, problems, or questions and write each on the top of a piece of paper. Divide students into small groups or pairs and pass a sheet of paper with prompt or problem down the row. Students have five minutes per round to generate as many ideas as possible. After passing through several rounds, students have a final five minutes to choose the &#8220;best&#8221; response and report out.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Tiered:<\/strong> Use flat-floor method but pass the papers down the row.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Online:<\/strong> List the topics on a shared doc or Padlet. Queue student groups to move to the next topic every five minutes.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Hybrid:<\/strong> Use same approach as online.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Examples:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>\u201cWhat causes [problem X]?\u201d \u201cWhat are the best approaches to solve [problem X]?\u201d<\/li>\n<li>(1) \u201cWhat would be good research questions about the University of Sydney student experience?\u201d (2) \u201cWhat methodolologies could a sociologist use to study the USyd student experience?\u201d (3) \u201cWhat ethical concerns might arise from a researcher studying the student experience and how might you mitigate these?\u201d<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Timing\/Pacing:<\/strong> 5 minutes per round, with at least 3 rounds + report out (5-10 min) for some or all groups.<\/p>\n<h3>Jigsaw<\/h3>\n<p><strong>What it is:<\/strong> Students become experts on a subtopic, then teach peers in mixed groups.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Flat\u2011floor:<\/strong> Form <strong>expert groups<\/strong> then <strong>teaching groups<\/strong>; use short handouts with descriptions of the subtopics and give the expert groups sentence starters; signal transitions with a timer\/bell.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Tiered:<\/strong> Minimise movement; assign expert prep in place; have students teach immediate neighbours; use shared slide templates for consistency.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Online:<\/strong> Run expert breakouts, then mixed breakouts; use a shared template and require a one\u2011slide summary per group.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Hybrid:<\/strong> Keep expert groups modality\u2011specific (in\u2011room vs online); reconvene in plenary where each group presents a concise summary.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Examples:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>STEMM:<\/strong> Experts on measurement error, bias, variance, trade\u2011offs \u2192 recombine to design a fair experiment.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Humanities and social sciences:<\/strong> Experts on historical context, genre conventions, rhetorical devices, audience reception \u2192 recombine to interpret a speech.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Timing\/Pacing:<\/strong> 10 min expert prep \u2192 2-3 minutes to recombine groups \u2192 10 min teach in mixed groups \u2192 5-10 min synthesis.<\/p>\n<h3>Gallery Walks<\/h3>\n<p><strong>What it is:<\/strong> Groups post work; peers circulate and comment.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Flat\u2011floor:<\/strong> Use walls\/boards; rotate every ~2 minutes; assign distinct pen colours to track feedback.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Tiered:<\/strong> Run a virtual gallery (e.g. on <a href=\"https:\/\/educational-innovation.sydney.edu.au\/teaching@sydney\/padlet-and-collaborative-learning\/\">Padlet<\/a> with comment function enabled); optionally rotate small batches to front walls if movement is feasible.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Online:<\/strong> Host a virtual gallery (e.g. using <a href=\"https:\/\/educational-innovation.sydney.edu.au\/teaching@sydney\/padlet-and-collaborative-learning\/\">Padlet<\/a> with comment function enabled or Zoom using the chat); students comment asynchronously or live; use tags (e.g., \u201c+\u201d, \u201c?\u201d) to focus critique.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Hybrid:<\/strong> All groups use <a href=\"https:\/\/educational-innovation.sydney.edu.au\/teaching@sydney\/padlet-and-collaborative-learning\/\">Padlet<\/a>; present joint findings in when the class comes back together.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Examples:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>STEMM:<\/strong> Alternative designs for a sustainable energy system; critique feasibility and trade\u2011offs.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Humanities and social sciences:<\/strong> Design the ideal \u201cuniversity of the future.\u201d<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Timing\/Pacing:<\/strong> 10-30 minutes poster design, depending on complexity of issue; 10-15min rotation \u2192 10 min debrief highlighting patterns and outliers.<\/p>\n<h3>Case\u2011Based Learning<\/h3>\n<p><strong>What it is:<\/strong> Analyse authentic scenarios using course concepts.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Flat\u2011floor:<\/strong> Assign roles (stakeholders); groups propose first actions plus rationale; record on mini\u2011whiteboards.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Tiered:<\/strong> Display the case on screen; designate rows to speak for stakeholders; collect decisions via poll and invite brief justifications.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Online:<\/strong> Share case text; assign roles in breakouts; report via a shared slide with \u201cDecision + Rationale + Risk.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong>Hybrid:<\/strong> Mirror roles across modalities; combine decisions in a central poll; harvest 1\u20132 justifications from each cohort.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Examples:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>STEMM:<\/strong> Public health case \u2014 prioritise interventions given limited budget and R\u2080<\/li>\n<li><strong>Humanities and social sciences:<\/strong> Ethics case \u2014 argue for\/against publication of leaked materials under specified frameworks.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Timing\/Pacing:<\/strong> 5-10 min individual read \u2192 6-15 min group analysis \u2192 5 min comparison. If time compresses, skip role assignment and focus on discussion (decision + rationale).<\/p>\n<h3>Structured Debates<\/h3>\n<p><strong>What it is:<\/strong> Teams prepare and present arguments under clear roles and timing.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Flat\u2011floor:<\/strong> Opposing sides of the room; roles (opener, rebutter, summariser); visible countdowns maintain pace.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Tiered:<\/strong> Assign positions by section; manage microphones; collect audience questions via poll\/chat to control turn\u2011taking.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Online:<\/strong> Assign team channels\/breakouts; enforce speaking order; use reactions (hand raise) for questions.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Hybrid:<\/strong> In\u2011room vs remote teams; facilitator moderates strict turn\u2011taking; display speakers on screen for equitable presence.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Examples:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>STEMM:<\/strong> \u201cCRISPR edits in human embryos should be permitted under strict regulation.\u201d<\/li>\n<li><strong>Humanities and social sciences:<\/strong> \u201cThe novel ultimately endorses rather than critiques imperial ideology.\u201d<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Timing\/Pacing:<\/strong> 3 min prep \u2192 2\u00d72 min openings \u2192 2\u00d72 min rebuttals \u2192 2 min audience Q \u2192 1 min closers \u2192 2 min debrief.<\/p>\n<h3>Role\u2011Plays \/ Simulations<\/h3>\n<p><strong>What it is:<\/strong> Students enact scenarios to apply knowledge and practise decision\u2011making.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Flat\u2011floor:<\/strong> Parallel stations with short scripts; rotate roles; observers use checklists for feedback.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Tiered:<\/strong> Front\u2011of\u2011room volunteers enact; the rest evaluate with a rubric; optionally run 1\u2011minute seated micro\u2011dialogs.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Online:<\/strong> Share role cards; run breakouts; observers annotate in a shared document; record short segments for playback.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Hybrid:<\/strong> Run simulations separately (in\u2011room vs online) and present outcomes in joint plenary; use a visualiser\/camera for in\u2011room action.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Examples:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>STEMM:<\/strong> Data governance meeting simulating a breach; propose containment and communication plans.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Humanities:<\/strong> Diplomatic negotiation reenactment; balance moral and pragmatic considerations.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Arts:<\/strong> Select a proposal for a public sculpture, considering various stakeholders.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Timing\/Pacing:<\/strong> 5 min brief \u2192 15-45 min play \u2192 10-15 min debrief. For large classes, run two shorter iterations.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h2>Tell me more!<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Self-service guide\u202fto hyflex\/hybrid teaching<\/strong>:\u202f<a class=\"usyd-js-load\" href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/usyd-hyflex1\">setting up your lecture theatre<i class=\"icon-link-ext\"><\/i><\/a> and some\u202f<a class=\"usyd-js-load\" href=\"https:\/\/educational-innovation.sydney.edu.au\/teaching@sydney\/tips-for-teaching-in-hyflex\/\">reflections for designing a hybrid session<i class=\"icon-link-ext\"><\/i><\/a>.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Workshops:<\/strong> \u202f&#8217;Hyflex and Teaching in Spillover Rooms&#8217; and\u202f&#8217;Using Lecterns Effectively&#8217; on our\u202f<a class=\"usyd-js-load\" title=\"https:\/\/www.sydney.edu.au\/education-portfolio\/qa\/events\/\" href=\"https:\/\/www.sydney.edu.au\/education-portfolio\/qa\/events\/\">events page.<i class=\"icon-link-ext\"><\/i><\/a><\/li>\n<li><strong>1:1 Consultation<\/strong>: for a customised consultation about\u202fstrategies to engage students including in large classes, please use\u202f<a class=\"usyd-js-load\" href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/hyflex-support\">our\u202fscheduling link\u202f<i class=\"icon-link-ext\"><\/i><\/a>.<\/li>\n<li>Enrol in a MPLF module such as February 2026, <a href=\"https:\/\/canvas.sydney.edu.au\/courses\/16284\/pages\/9-dot-1-engaging-students-in-small-classes-module-overview\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">M09 Engaging students in small classes\u00a0 &#8211; active learning in all our teaching spaces<\/a><\/li>\n<li>Read about the <a href=\"https:\/\/educational-innovation.sydney.edu.au\/teaching@sydney\/working-it-out-for-themselves-the-effect-of-active-learning-on-student-outcomes\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">effect of active learning on student outcomes<\/a><\/li>\n<li>Read <a href=\"https:\/\/educational-innovation.sydney.edu.au\/teaching@sydney\/recipe-for-student-success-the-key-ingredients-for-achievement\/\">the key elements of teaching that affect student achievement<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>References<\/h2>\n<p>Bonwell C. C. &amp; Eison, J.A. (1991).\u00a0<em>Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom<\/em>. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1. Washington, DC: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.<\/p>\n<p>Felten, P., &amp; Lambert, L. (2020) <em>Relationship-rich education: How human connections drive success in college.<\/em> Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.<\/p>\n<p>Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., &amp; Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111<\/em>(23), 8410-8415.<\/p>\n<p>Theobald, E. J., Hill, M. J., Tran, E., Agrawal, S., Arroyo, E. N., Behling, S., &#8230; &amp; Freeman, S. (2020). Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math.\u00a0<i>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences<\/i>,\u00a0<i>117<\/i>(12), 6476-6483.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Practical techniques for effective engagement in flat\u2011floor, tiered, online, and hybrid classes The start of the academic year is always an exciting time for&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":18,"featured_media":25389,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[191,56,57,398],"tags":[],"coauthors":[462,4199,573,499],"class_list":["post-25385","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-fy-coordinators","category-news-events","category-teaching-tips","category-transition","post-item","post-even"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/educational-innovation.sydney.edu.au\/teaching@sydney\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25385","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/educational-innovation.sydney.edu.au\/teaching@sydney\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/educational-innovation.sydney.edu.au\/teaching@sydney\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/educational-innovation.sydney.edu.au\/teaching@sydney\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/18"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/educational-innovation.sydney.edu.au\/teaching@sydney\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25385"}],"version-history":[{"count":16,"href":"https:\/\/educational-innovation.sydney.edu.au\/teaching@sydney\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25385\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":25434,"href":"https:\/\/educational-innovation.sydney.edu.au\/teaching@sydney\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25385\/revisions\/25434"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/educational-innovation.sydney.edu.au\/teaching@sydney\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/25389"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/educational-innovation.sydney.edu.au\/teaching@sydney\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25385"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/educational-innovation.sydney.edu.au\/teaching@sydney\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25385"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/educational-innovation.sydney.edu.au\/teaching@sydney\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25385"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/educational-innovation.sydney.edu.au\/teaching@sydney\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=25385"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}